Cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy
Article information
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection during pregnancy is a global silent problem. Additionally, it is the leading cause of congenital infections, non-genetic sensorineural hearing loss, and neurodevelopmental delays in infants. However, this has barely been recognized globally. This condition lacks adequate attention, which is further emphasized by the lack of awareness among healthcare workers and the general population. The impact of CMV infection is often overlooked because of the asymptomatic nature of its presentation in infected pregnant women and newborns, difficulty in diagnosis, and the perception that infants born to women with pre-existing antibodies against CMV have normal neonatal outcomes. This article highlights the latest information on the epidemiology, transmission, clinical manifestations, and development of CMV infection and its management. We reviewed the pathophysiology and clinical manifestations of CMV infection in pregnant women, diagnostic methods, including screening and prognostic markers, and updates in treatment modalities. Current advancements in research on vaccination and hyperimmunoglobulins with worldwide treatment protocols are highlighted.
Introduction
During pregnancy, cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common cause of congenital viral infections, with an incidence of 0.5–1.0% and 0.6–6.0% of all live births in developed [1,2] and developing countries, respectively. The birth prevalence of congenital CMV infection is 0.2–2.5% around the globe and varies by geographic region based on the level of immunity in pregnant women in that population [3]. Additionally, it is the leading non-genetic cause of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), a major infection-related cause of congenital malformations in high-income countries and neurological disability [4], and is responsible for approximately 10% of all cerebral palsy and 8–21% of all congenital SNHL cases at birth [5–7].
Globally, the seroprevalence of CMV in people of reproductive age is 86%, with the highest in the World Health Organization Eastern Mediterranean region (90%) and the lowest in European countries (66%) [8]. In areas with high seroprevalence, the rate of congenital CMV is 1–5%; in areas with low seroprevalence, the rate is 0.4–2.0% [3,9–12]. The increasing seroprevalence in most developing countries is due to the high exposure to CMV in overcrowded places in urban settings, increased contact with infants and toddlers, poor hygiene, early sexual debuts, and multiple sexual partners [13]. CMV infection can be primary (exposure to CMV for the first time) or non-primary (reactivation of a latent strain or reinfection with a new strain in an infected mother) [14]. The transmission rate of CMV is directly related to gestational age at infection. No severe congenital infection was observed if the maternal infection occurred after 14 weeks of gestation [15].
Approximately 10–15% of congenitally infected babies are symptomatic at birth and develop neurodevelopmental injuries within the first 3 years. Among them, 50–60% will have severe neurological abnormalities, and 20–30% will die of disseminated intravascular coagulation, hepatic dysfunction, or bacterial sepsis. Within the asymptomatic group (85–90% of cases), approximately 5–15% will develop late sequelae of CMV, such as SNHL, delayed psychomotor development, and visual impairment [16,17]. Kagan and Hamprecht [18] concluded that the overall risk of symptomatic congenital CMV (cCMV) infection after maternal seroconversion in the first trimester is 1 in 10. It then changes to 1 in 4 if amniocentesis is positive for CMV and 1 in 200 if negative. Among positive amniocentesis cases, in the presence of cCMV ultrasound findings, the risk increases to 1 in 2; in the absence, it decreases to 1 in 8 [18].
CMV infection remains a crucial challenge worldwide, without actual therapy for pregnant women and established vaccines, and there is confusion regarding its pathophysiology, prevention, and treatment [19]. Due to its prevalence in the general population, uncertainty about its transmission and the asymptomatic nature of the disease in healthy women pose a threat to the prevention and treatment of CMV infections [13]. Finer elucidation of the factors that influence the occurrence of congenital infections and diseases in the offspring of immune mothers is required to plan preventive strategies and estimate the potential effectiveness of vaccines [20].
Pathophysiology and clinical manifestations
Microbiological characteristics and mechanisms of pathology
CMV is a double-stranded DNA virus that belongs to the Herpesviridae family. The virus is a large, complex agent with genetic material 20 times larger than that of the human immunodeficiency virus. Human CMV infections result from the virus-mediated evasion of T-cell immunity. The CMV lyses host cells, infects various cells and tissues, and remains latent within the host. The virus disseminates throughout the body by infecting the white blood cells and vascular endothelial cells. They interfere with the recognition and processing of viral proteins by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules, induce abrupt helper T-cell responses by degrading MHC class II molecules and inhibit the action of natural killer cells in the host [21].
CMV spreads from the placenta to developing embryos or fetuses. They are transmitted via the syncytiotrophoblast layer covering the chorionic villi, resulting in unfavorable placental and consequent fetal development. Additionally, trophoblast infection impairs interstitial implantation, which explains the early pregnancy loss associated with CMV infection [22].
Primary maternal CMV infections-source of infection and transmission of CMV
The most common route of CMV spread is through the saliva or other bodily secretions of toddlers who shed the virus asymptomatically for months. In addition to transplacental transmission, breast milk can spread the virus to infants, particularly those born preterm. CMV can be transmitted sexually through solid organs or hematopoietic cell transplantation and rarely through blood transfusion from seropositive patients [23]. The transmission rate via breastfeeding is 58–69% in term babies, 5.7–58.6% in preterm infants, and 38% in preterm babies with a birth weight <1,200 g or gestational age <32 weeks [24,25].
The risk of vertical transmission and unfavorable fetal outcomes is highest with maternal primary CMV infection. However, the risk of transmission can be determined weeks before conception [4]. The rate of transmission is directly related to the gestational age at the time of maternal infection, being lowest in the first trimester (30%), followed by the second trimester (45%), and highest in the third trimester (72%) [26]. The rate of CMV transmission is 0–10% during the preconception period (2–8 weeks before the start of the last menstrual period [LMP]), while it is approximately 25–45% during the periconceptional period (1 week before to 5 weeks after the LMP) [27]. Approximately 30–35% of vertical transmission occurs following primary infection, and 10–15% of congenital diseases. Hamilton et al. [28] reported CMV infection modulates the placental immune environment suggesting CMV-induced cytokines such as monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 and tumor necrosis factor alpha might initiate placental damage (Fig. 1). Transmission during non-primary infections can be as low as 1.2% [29]. Despite the highest transmission rate in the third trimester, fetal outcomes are always good [30]. Primary CMV infection in the third trimester or at the delivery time is not contraindicated for vaginal delivery [31]. Of the asymptomatic cases at birth due to primary infection, 25% develop sequelae by 2 years, while 8% of non-primary CMV infections develop sequelae by 2 years and 14% by 5 years of age [32].
Transmission mechanisms and treatment protocols for CMV infection during pregnancy. CMV, cytomegalovirus; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha; IUGR, intrauterine growth restriction; IgG, immunoglobulin G; IgM, immunoglobulin M; RT-PCR, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; CNS, central nervous system.
The role of natural defense mechanisms against the reinfection and transmission of congenital infections is not widely understood. However, pre-existing immunity to CMV infection is protective against new CMV infections [33]. The risk of congenital CMV infection is 69% lower in infants born to seropositive mothers before pregnancy than in those who undergo seroconversion during pregnancy [20]. Breastfeeding with CMV infection is recommended if the gestational age is >32 weeks at birth or if the birth weight of the neonates is >1,000 g. Breast milk, including colostrum, should be pasteurized for preterm babies after 3 days of lactation [34]. A detailed classification of congenital infections is presented in Table 1.
Non-primary maternal CMV infections
Non-primary CMV infection was defined as CMV infection before pregnancy. Similar to other herpes viruses, CMV remains latent in the host after infection. These are recurrent or secondary infections due to the reactivation of latent infection or reinfection with a fresh strain [35]. Uncertainty remains regarding the epidemiology of non-primary infections. Moreover, deciphering how many pregnant women will experience reactivation or reinfection of CMV, how many will develop congenital infections, or the clinical spectrum of congenital infection following non-primary CMV infection during pregnancy remains a challenge [36]. When anti-CMV antibodies are produced following a primary infection, they do not protect against reactivation or reinfection by a new strain. Hence, seropositivity before pregnancy does not eliminate the risk of congenital non-primary infections [1].
Clinical features and ultrasound findings
Ultrasound abnormalities can be observed for at least 12 weeks after maternal CMV infection [27]. After confirmation of cCMV infection through amniocentesis, serial ultrasonography is performed every 2–3 weeks until delivery [32]. The involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) in cCMV infection is more destructive than that of other organ systems and is considered irreversible. Neurological deficits are observed at birth or in early childhood and persist throughout life [37]. Various CNS abnormalities associated with cCMV infection are caused by early fetal brain inflammation, destruction, or obstruction. These include ventriculomegaly (>15 mm), microcephaly (<2 standard deviation), periventricular echogenicity, hydrocephaly, increased cisterna magna width (>8 mm), vermian hypoplasia, periventricular cysts, corpus callosum agenesis, lissencephaly, and porencephaly. Ventriculomegaly and microcephaly are associated with poor fetal outcomes. Milder CNS abnormalities include ventriculomegaly (10–15 mm), intracranial calcifications, choroid plexus cysts, subependymal cysts, and intraventricular synechia [38,39]. Involvement of the gastrointestinal system can be indicated by hyperechogenic bowel disease, hepatosplenomegaly, pleural effusion, ascites, or hydrops. Splenomegaly is a common ultrasound finding in cCMV infections, and splenic artery Doppler is a non-invasive marker of congenital infection due to diminished arterial blood flow [40–42]. CMV interferes with cardiac development and causes cardiomegaly, pericardial effusion, and calcifications [43].
Commonly observed symptoms of cCMV infection at birth include jaundice, skin lesions, fetal growth restriction, microcephaly, hepatosplenomegaly, thrombocytopenia, and impaired hearing. CMV-associated SNHL usually presents at birth or progresses and rapidly worsens during the first few years of life [44]. Viral infections lead to labyrinthitis, destruction of the vestibular endolymphatic system and organs (the utricle and saccule), and collapse of the saccular membrane [37]. The risk of hearing loss is associated with the viral load. An increase in viral load and duration of viral urinary excretion in symptomatic and non-symptomatic congenitally infected children is associated with hearing loss [34]. Tables 2,3 summarize the clinical features and ultrasound findings of cCMV infection, respectively.
Signs and symptoms of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections
The most common type of SNHL is a flat hearing configuration (equal degree of hearing loss for all frequencies, high or low), which represents damage to the entire cochlea [45,46]. Progressive SNHL is a sensorineural decrease in hearing of 10 dB at any frequency or auditory brainstem response threshold documented in two separate evaluations. The fluctuating type of SNHL is observed in 20–30% of cases and is defined as a decrease in hearing greater than 10 dB or more at any frequency, followed by an improvement of greater than 10 dB at one or more times. Hearing improvements can be observed in otherwise asymptomatic patients [47]. Only 5.7% of congenitally infected neonates, 29.3–44.4% of symptomatic neonates, and 1.6–3.4% of asymptomatic neonates require hearing aids or cochlear implants [48,49]. Neurological sequelae, apart from SNHL, following congenital CMV infection can result in developmental delays, cognitive impairment, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, impaired vision, and autism spectrum disorder [4].
Prognostic markers
Predicting the prognosis of congenital CMV infection is challenging and depends on three factors: timing of the infection, presence and type of fetal abnormalities, and laboratory markers. Fetal cerebral abnormalities are primary ultrasound prognostic markers [31]. The addition of fetal magnetic resonance imaging to ultrasound was reported to be mutually complementary rather than exclusive to each other for the diagnosis of cerebral lesions, with both specificity and negative predictive value of 93.3% for this combined imaging modality [50,51]. A high viral load in the amniotic fluid, thrombocytopenia, and high DNAemia in the fetus are associated with CMV infection, even in the absence of cerebral anomalies on ultrasound [52].
Screening and diagnostic methods
Screening methods
Walker et al. [53] suggested several screening approaches that could have been effective: 1) to screen all women preconceptionally or early in pregnancy; 2) to screen only women who are at the highest risk of exposure to CMV infection (prolonged contact with toddlers or those who work at daycare centers); 3) “once off” screening around 20 weeks of gestation, including avidity tests with serology, to identify all women who have acquired primary infections early in pregnancy; or 4) targeted screening of pregnant women using ultrasound scans suggestive of congenital fetal infection [53].
Currently, routine screening for CMV is not encouraged because of the lack of effective maternal treatment or counseling programs, epidemiological data regarding the rate of secondary maternal infection and its consequences, difficulty in establishing the prognosis of congenital infection, and possible negative effects of screening, such as increased anxiety, early elective abortion, and abusive amniocentesis [7]. The inclusion of a routine screening test for CMV is beneficial, as it is a major public health problem with significant morbidity and mortality and is more common than Down syndrome. Early screening and reduction of primary infections in mothers are always beneficial, as CMV has no available treatment [54,55]. Reichman et al. [56] hypothesized that pre-conceptional screening of women undergoing fertility treatment would be advantageous in reducing CMV exposure during pregnancy. Notably, none of the international guidelines recommends routine screening for CMV infection in pregnant women.
Diagnostic tests
1) Testing for maternal CMV infection: whom should we test?
CMV testing is usually performed in patients with (i) maternal flu-like symptoms (which are primarily nonspecific, such as rhinitis, pharyngitis, myalgia, arthralgia, headache, or fatigue) or those with symptoms of glandular fever (fever, malaise, myalgia, or cervical lymphadenopathy) and negative results for Epstein-Barr virus infection; ii) symptoms of hepatitis (negative tests for hepatitis A, B, and C) during pregnancy; or iii) ultrasound findings suggestive of possible CMV infection [27].
The standard method for diagnosing primary CMV infection is to demonstrate CMV-specific IgG seroconversion in pregnant women who were seronegative for immunoglobulin G (IgG) before pregnancy (Fig. 2). This test is possible if a serum sample is available from a woman before pregnancy. In the absence of a serum sample, the measurement of immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG levels is necessary for diagnosis. Although the sensitivity of IgM screening tests is high, they have low specificity for the diagnosis of primary infections. In addition, IgM remains positive for more than a year after an acute infection, as observed in the reactivation or reinfection of CMV with a different strain. Cross-reactivity with other diseases, such as Parvovirus B19, Epstein-Barr virus infection, or systemic lupus erythematosus, gives false-positive results, making it difficult to diagnose primary infections and differentiate between primary and non-primary infections upon documentation of recent seroconversion [31].
Flow chart for the interpretation of the maternal cytomegalovirus (CMV) serology test results. IgG, immunoglobulin G; IgM, immunoglobulin M.
The avidity IgG assay can detect primary infections more accurately than an IgM assay alone. Avidity levels are typically expressed as an avidity index, the percentage of IgG bound to an antigen after treatment with a denaturing agent. Avidity indices (vitek immunodiagnostic assay system CMV IgG index) can be classified into three categories: low (<20%), indicative of a recent primary infection within the last 3 months; high (>80%), excluding a recent primary infection; and intermediate (20–80%), which does not allow discrimination between recent and past infections [57,58]. The Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine recommends that the diagnosis of primary maternal infection should be based on IgG seroconversion, positive CMV IgM, positive IgG, or low IgG avidity [32]. Other tests available for diagnosing primary maternal infections include a four-fold rise in serum IgG levels over 14–21 days [59]. Fig. 2 shows the maternal CMV serological test results.
2) Diagnosis of fetal CMV infection-intrauterine and in neonates at birth
The most common ultrasound findings for congenital CMV infection are echogenic fetal bowel, cerebral ventriculomegaly and calcifications, and fetal growth restriction [60,61]. However, it takes 6–8 weeks for the fetus to excrete the virus in the urine after maternal CMV infection. Recognition of this lag interval is necessary for the timing of amniocentesis and to avoid false-negative results. Therefore, amniocentesis is performed at approximately 21 weeks and at least 8 weeks after maternal infection and is the best prenatal diagnostic test for fetal congenital CMV infection. CMV DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the standard method for detecting infections and nearly excludes antenatal fetal infections. A negative result has a sensitivity of 90–95% and a specificity of 97–100% [62–64]. Cordocentesis is another diagnostic option with the same accuracy as amniocentesis but with more side effects because of the invasiveness of the procedure [62,63].
In newborns, congenital CMV is suspected when: i) there are signs and symptoms consistent with cCMV disease, like microcephaly, being small for gestational age, thrombocytopenia, hepatosplenomegaly, and jaundice (direct hyperbilirubinemia) at birth that cannot be explained by other causes; ii) abnormal neuroimaging findings suggestive of CMV, including periventricular calcifications, lenticulostriate vasculopathy, white matter disease, ventriculomegaly, migrational abnormalities; iii) documented SNHL at birth; and iv) severely immunocompromised newborns upon screening (abnormal T cell excision circles) [65].
CMV infection in neonates should be diagnosed within 21 days of life by extracting CMV from saliva or urine, as it is difficult to distinguish between congenital and postnatal infections after 3 weeks of life. False-positive results with saliva samples have been reported; hence, any positive saliva test should be confirmed by detecting CMV in urine [66]. Virus isolation via culture is expensive, time-consuming, and uncontrollable and cannot be used for screening a larger population. Thus, it is preferable to use a real-time PCR test for diagnosis because it is inexpensive, not influenced by storage and transportation conditions, and requires minimal maintenance [34]. Serological studies in neonates are sensitive, as maternal antibodies remain in circulation for up to 1 year after birth [65]. There is a role for dried blood spot (Guthrie cards) PCR in testing for CMV, but it has low sensitivity and is mainly used in children with delayed-onset sequelae and for retrospective diagnoses. After 3 weeks of age, the diagnosis of CMV infection is based on clinical findings and laboratory testing for CMV, excluding the etiologies of the differential diagnoses of CMV infection [21].
After confirming a CMV infection, infants with congenital infections should be further evaluated using comprehensive physical (weight, height, and head circumference to rule out microcephaly), neurological, and neurodevelopmental examinations. Complete blood counts, liver and kidney function tests, hearing evaluations using auditory brainstem-evoked responses, ophthalmological evaluations, and neuroimaging have been performed [67].
Management of CMV infection in pregnancy
Prevention modalities
1) Vaccines
CMV elicits humoral and T-cell responses [68]. Neutralizing antibodies against envelope glycoproteins and viral proteins such as pp65, IE1, and IE2 are involved in the regulation of CMV infection and reactivation [69]. Pentameric (gH/gL/UL128/UL130/UL131A) and glycoprotein B (gB) antibodies neutralize the infection of endothelial, epithelial, myeloid cells, and fibroblasts, respectively [70,71]. Fu et al. [72] speculated that a whole-virus vaccine could induce immune responses similar to those induced by natural infections.
Two previously reported vaccines, the live attenuated virus Towne and recombinant gB/MF59 vaccines, have shown moderate efficacy against CMV in seronegative women. However, both vaccines failed to produce neutralizing antibodies against the pentameric complex, a response similar to that observed in natural CMV infections [73–75]. The V160 vaccine, derived from the live AD169 strain, which was genetically engineered to express the pentameric complex, has been evaluated in phase I trials for vaccine safety and immunogenicity in CMV-seropositive and -seronegative women and has exhibited an acceptable safety profile [33]. However, uncertainty regarding the ability of naturally acquired immunity to prevent future infections is a major impediment to the development of vaccines against CMV infections. These vaccines should protect against primary infections, reactivation, and reinfection with different CMV strains [20].
2) Behavioural modifications
The do’s and don’ts practices to mitigate the spread of CMV infection are as follows: the dos include assuming that children below 3 years of age shed CMV in their urine and saliva, improvements in personal hygiene practices and thorough hand washing is needed after contact with young children’s dirty laundry, diaper changes, wiping runny nose or drool, or handling toys, pacifiers, or toothbrushes. The don’ts include contact with saliva when kissing a child; sharing food, utensils, drinks, or toys used by toddlers. This behavioral modification is the most practical and economical way to mitigate the risk of CMV infection during pregnancy. Leruez-Ville et al. [4] reviewed the benefits of preventive behaviors by both parents. They avoid contact with bodily fluids from infected individuals, especially toddlers, from preconception to 14 weeks of gestation. Furthermore, Barber et al. [76] emphasized the need for effective interventions in routine care to change patient behavior and reduce the risk of CMV infection.
Worldwide treatment protocols and guidelines
CMV hyperimmunoglobulin (CMV HIG) is not indicated to prevent the fetal transmission of maternal primary CMV infections. Moreover, antiviral treatment for fetal CMV infection is not routinely recommended [67] (Fig. 1).
The proposed antiviral drugs in the management of CMV infection are foscarent, cidofovir, ganciclovir and valaciclovir. They are being used in the treatment of non-pregnant, immunocompromised and transplant patients. All except, Valaciclovir, have teratogenic and toxic effects, thus not recommended during pregnancy. Valacyclovir, an oral prodrug of acyclovir with high bioavailability, has been used to treat congenital CMV infections [37,77,78]. Jacquemard et al. [77] were the first to report the use of oral valaciclovir during pregnancy to treat known fetal infections. They achieved therapeutic drug concentrations in maternal and fetal blood, thereby decreasing the viral load in fetal blood. However, the study lacked randomization [77]. The phase II open-label trial CYMEVAL (in utero treatment of CMV congenital infection with valaciclovir) used a high dose of oral valaciclovir (8 g/day) in women with moderately to severely infected fetuses with non-severe ultrasound features. The trial showed that 82% of fetuses were born asymptomatic in the treatment group and 43% in the placebo group. This study further emphasizes the safety profile of high-dose valaciclovir. The only limitation was the lack of randomization [47].
Shahar-Nissan et al. [79] were the first to study the use of valaciclovir to prevent fetal transmission following maternal primary CMV infection. The treatment group received 8 g/day valaciclovir (16 capsules per day: 8 capsules in the morning and 8 in the evening; each capsule contained 500 mg valaciclovir and 200 mg inactive ingredients), whereas the control group received the same amount of identical placebo tablets. Of the 44 fetuses in the valaciclovir group, only 3 were symptomatic; 14 out of 43 fetuses in the control group were symptomatic [79]. A case-control study by Faure-Bardon et al. [80] confirmed the use of valaciclovir in the first trimester of pregnancy for secondary prevention of cCMV in a well-established routine maternal serum screening policy. Similarly, in a retrospective study, Egloff et al. [81] reported that valaciclovir reduced maternal-fetal transmission in the second trimester, especially in the presence of positive maternal viremia. A non-randomized, first-of-its-kind study evaluated the efficacy of the combined use of valaciclovir (2 g/6 hours) and CMV HIG (200 international unit [IU]/kg) for the treatment of cCMV, especially in the presence of changes in cerebral echography or high viral load in the amniotic fluid [82].
Despite numerous studies, there is still no approved treatment for CMV infections during pregnancy [83]. However, with accumulating evidence reporting the benefit of high-dose valaciclovir, Codaccioni et al. [84] used off-label valaciclovir (8 g/day) in infected pregnant mothers and reported a low maternal viral load and the birth of a clinically asymptomatic infant. Table 4 lists the international guidelines and recommendations for the management of cCMV infections.
List of guidelines and their recommendations on the management of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection
1) CMV hyperimmunoglobulin
Nigro et al. [85] were the first to use CMV HIG to prevent maternal-fetal transmission and congenital diseases in infected fetuses. A phase II, randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy of hyperimmunoglobulin and showed that, among 123 subjects, the rate of congenital infection in the hyperimmunoglobulin group was 30% compared to 44% in the placebo group. No significant differences were observed between or within the two groups regarding viral transmission, levels of virus-specific antibodies, T cell-mediated immune responses, or viral DNA load. No significant modification was noted in the primary infection during pregnancy [86]. In a non-randomized trial, Kagan et al. [87] studied the biweekly use of CMV HIG (200 IU/kg) in seropositive women (primary infection) in the first trimester until 20 weeks of gestation to prevent maternal-fetal transmission. Recently, a multicenter, double-blind trial concluded that the administration of CMV HIG before 24 weeks of gestation did not lower the incidence of congenital infection or perinatal death compared to the placebo group [88]. In an ongoing observational study, CMV HIG was reported to be beneficial for treating primary infections in the first trimester or periconception period when administered biweekly at a dose of 200 IU/kg [89]. Given the ambiguity of the results of HIG administration, it is currently not recommended for treatment [31].
2) Recent updates
A newer drug, letermovir, can be used for the prophylaxis of CMV infection in seropositive recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants aged over 18 years. However, further studies are required to determine their use in the prevention and treatment of congenital CMV infections during pregnancy [4]. Letermovir, an antiviral that targets the viral terminase complex, was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2017 as a prophylactic agent to prevent CMV infection and disease in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Hamilton et al. [90] studied Letermovir, Maribavir, and other antivirals in human placental models and ex vivo placental tissue to assess their antiviral efficacy and toxicity and found that letermovir exhibited effectiveness and low toxicity in placental trophoblast cell cultures during the first trimester and placental explant histo-cultures during the third trimester. However, further research is needed to characterize these antivirals in terms of their applicability to extended antiviral treatment regimens. In a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized study of CMV HIG to prevent cCMV infection, models were developed to predict cCMV infection in the presence of primary maternal infection and the absence of ultrasound findings. The four-factor model included government-assisted medical insurance, IgG avidity <32%, IgM antibody index >4.5 (or high), and CMV detectable in the maternal plasma [91].
Conclusion
CMV infections during pregnancy are a public concern. Women need to be protected from acquiring the disease by following hygienic practices, preventing maternal-fetal viral transmission in utero, and treating congenital infections if they occur. Despite our knowledge of primary CMV infections, we do not fully understand the biology, transmission, and accuracy of tests to diagnose non-primary CMV infections. The roles of antiviral drugs, CMV HIG, and anti-CMV vaccines are still being researched. Randomized trials with larger cohorts are needed to prove the efficacy of antiviral drugs in the treatment and prevention of cCMV infection.
Notes
Conflict of interest
None.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Patient consent
Not applicable.
Funding information
None.