Korean J Obstet Gynecol Search


Korean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 1998;41(11):2754-2758.
Published online January 1, 2001.
Clinical Results of Transvaginal Multifetal Pregnancy Reduction According to the Gestational Period.
Dae Joon Cheon, Eun Hee Kang, Hyung Sik Chu, Hee Dong Chae, Chung Hoon Kim, Byung Moon Kang, Yoon Seok Chang, Jung Eun Mok
To compare the pregnancy outcomes of transvaginal multifetal pregnancy reduction (MFPR) according to the gestational period when the procedure was performed METHODS: From January l995 to February 1998, total 27 patients with multiple pregnancy were included in this study. The patients were grouped to early MFPR group (<8 weeks, n=16) and delayed MFPR group (>8 weeks, n=ll) according to the gestational age that MFPRs were performed. All MFPRs were performed by transvaginal sonography-guided fetal aspiration or mechanical trauma. The complete pregnancy loss rate before 24 weeks of gestation, spontaneous loss of embryo, procedure-related complication, gestational age at delivery, and pregnancy complication were compared between the two groups. Statistical analysis of data was performed using Students t-test and Fishers exact test as appropriate. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the complete pregnancy loss rate between the early MFPR group (6.3%) and the delayed MFPR group (27.3%). The incidence of partial spontaneous loss of embryo in the two groups were not differed significantly (6.3% vs. 18.2%). The procedure-related complication of the delayed MFPR group (36.4%) seemed to be higher than that of the early MFPR group (6.3%), however there was no statistical difference (p=0, 07). Especially, all 3 patients in whom the MFPR was performed after 10 weeks suffered from the procedure-related complication. The mean gestational age at delivery of the two groups were not differed significantly (36.3+2.8 weeks vs. 37.0+1.3 weeks). There was also no significant difference in the mean birth weights of the two groups (2378.8+563.7 gm vs. 2427.1+436.2 gm). CONCLUSION: Although there was no statistically significant difference, the early transvaginal MFPR might be a safe and useful method without significant adverse complications compared to the delayed MFPR.
Key Words: Transvaginal multifetal pregnancy reduction ( MFPR ), Pregnancy outcome

Article category

Browse all articles >


Browse all articles >

Editorial Office
4th Floor, 36 Gangnam-daero 132-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06044, Korea
Tel: +82-2-3445-2382    Fax: +82-2-3445-2440    E-mail: journal@ogscience.org                

Copyright © 2022 by Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next