Comparative Results of Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy and Vaginal Hysterectomy. |
Young Mi Ko, Young Ok Yoo, Gee Young Park, Chul Hoon Park, Eun Joo Lee, Jung Gee Lee, Hee Bong Moon, Heung Gee Kim, Chang Yee Kim |
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Paul Hosp ital, Medical college of Catholic University, Seoul, Korea. |
|
Abstract |
OBJECTIVE To compare the outcomes of a method of assigning patients to a vaginal or laparoscopically assisted vaginal approach to hysterectomy. METHOD: Hysterectomy is the most common gynecologic operation. A clinical evaluation was attempted to analyze 100 cases of LAVH which was performed at St. Paul hospital from May 1997 to March 2000, and to compare them with 100 cases of vaginal hysterectomy at the same hospital. we used simple electrosurgical technique without using the disposable staples and other instruments. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients for LAVH was 46.18 years and that of VTH was 50.23 years. The most common indication for LAVH and VTH was Myoma uteri. The mean Hb change in LAVH was 2.15 and the Hb change of VTH was 2.17. The mean operative time of LAVH was 142.96 minutes and that of VTH was 77.06 minutes. The mean weight of uterus for LAVH was 221g and the mean weight of VTH was 182 g. The total percentage of urinary tract injury for LAVH was 3 % and that for VTH was 2 %. CONCLUSION: VTH, if possible, must be considered as a primary choice since it is were efficient than LAVH in cost, cosmetic aspects and complications. Further LAVH may be replaced with a laparotomy for hysterectomy in case of an insufficient operational experience, a previous abdominal operation hystory and the incapability of being indicated for VTH. |
Key Words:
LAVH, VTH |
|