1. Radeka G, Novakov-Mikic A, Ivanovic L. The Bishop score and induction of labor. Med Pregl 2002;55:189-194. PMID:
12170860.
2. Teixeira C, Lunet N, Rodrigues T, Barros H. The Bishop score as a determinant of labour induction success: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012;286:739-753. PMID:
22546948.
3. Kolkman DG, Verhoeven CJ, Brinkhorst SJ, van der Post JA, Pajkrt E, Opmeer BC, et al. The bishop score as a predictor of labor induction success: a systematic review. Am J Perinatol 2013;30:625-630. PMID:
23283806.
4. Hendrix NW, Chauhan SP, Morrison JC, Magann EF, Martin JN Jr, Devoe LD. Bishop score: a poor diagnostic test to predict failed induction versus vaginal delivery. South Med J 1998;91:248-252. PMID:
9521363.
5. Zelig CM, Nichols SF, Dolinsky BM, Hecht MW, Napolitano PG. Interaction between maternal obesity and Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor in term, nulliparous patients. Am J Perinatol 2013;30:75-80. PMID:
22836819.
6. Faltin-Traub EF, Boulvain M, Faltin DL, Extermann P, Irion O. Reliability of the Bishop score before labour induction at term. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004;112:178-181. PMID:
14746954.
7. Crane JM, Hutchens D. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length to predict preterm birth in asymptomatic women at increased risk: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31:579-587. PMID:
18412093.
8. Owen J. Evaluation of the cervix by ultrasound for the prediction of preterm birth. Clin Perinatol 2003;30:735-755. PMID:
14714921.
9. Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med 1996;334:567-572. PMID:
8569824.
10. Owen J, Yost N, Berghella V, Thom E, Swain M, Dildy GA 3rd, et al. Mid-trimester endovaginal sonography in women at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth. JAMA 2001;286:1340-1348. PMID:
11560539.
11. Podobnik M, Bulic M, Smiljanic N, Bistricki J. Ultrasonography in the detection of cervical incompetency. J Clin Ultrasound 1988;16:383-391. PMID:
3152257.
12. Barber MA, Medina M, Cabrera F, Romero A, Valle L, Garcia-Hernandez JA. Cervical length vs VOCAL cervical volume for predicting pre-term delivery in asymptomatic women at 20-22 weeks' pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol 2012;32:648-651. PMID:
22943710.
13. Jo YS, Jang DG, Kim N, Kim SJ, Lee G. Comparison of cervical parameters by three-dimensional ultrasound according to parity and previous delivery mode. Int J Med Sci 2011;8:673-678. PMID:
22135614.
14. Dilek TU, Gurbuz A, Yazici G, Arslan M, Gulhan S, Pata O, et al. Comparison of cervical volume and cervical length to predict preterm delivery by transvaginal ultrasound. Am J Perinatol 2006;23:167-172. PMID:
16586237.
15. Hoesli IM, Surbek DV, Tercanli S, Holzgreve W. Three dimensional volume measurement of the cervix during pregnancy compared to conventional 2D-sonography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999;64:115-119. PMID:
10189018.
16. Park IY, Kwon JY, Kwon JY, Hong SC, Choi HM, Kwon HS, et al. Usefulness of cervical volume by three-dimensional ultrasound in identifying the risk for preterm birth. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011;37:1039-1045. PMID:
21658838.
17. Rozenberg P, Rafii A, Senat MV, Dujardin A, Rapon J, Ville Y. Predictive value of two-dimensional and three-dimensional multiplanar ultrasound evaluation of the cervix in preterm labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003;13:237-241. PMID:
12854923.
18. Furtado MR, Pires CR, Araujo Junior E, De Souza E, Nardozza LM, Moron AF. Transvaginal grey scale histogram of the cervix at 20-25 weeks of pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2010;50:444-449. PMID:
21039378.
19. Kuwata T, Matsubara S, Taniguchi N, Ohkuchi A, Ohkusa T, Suzuki M. A novel method for evaluating uterine cervical consistency using vaginal ultrasound gray-level histogram. J Perinat Med 2010;38:491-494. PMID:
20443760.
20. Tekesin I, Hellmeyer L, Heller G, Romer A, Kuhnert M, Schmidt S. Evaluation of quantitative ultrasound tissue characterization of the cervix and cervical length in the prediction of premature delivery for patients with spontaneous preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:532-539. PMID:
14520230.
21. Tekesin I, Wallwiener D, Schmidt S. The value of quantitative ultrasound tissue characterization of the cervix and rapid fetal fibronectin in predicting preterm delivery. J Perinat Med 2005;33:383-391. PMID:
16238532.
22. Jorn H, Kalf K, Schwann R, Rath W. Grey-scale texture analysis of the cervix in pregnancy. Ultraschall Med 2006;27:347-354. PMID:
16894506.
23. Rovas L, Sladkevicius P, Strobel E, Valentin L. Reference data representative of normal findings at two-dimensional and three-dimensional gray-scale ultrasound examination of the cervix from 17 to 41 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:392-402. PMID:
16388513.
24. Rovas L, Sladkevicius P, Strobel E, Valentin L. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of three-dimensional gray-scale and power Doppler ultrasound examinations of the cervix in pregnant women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;26:132-137. PMID:
15959922.
25. Yilmaz NC, Yigiter AB, Kavak ZN, Durukan B, Gokaslan H. Longitudinal examination of cervical volume and vascularization changes during the antepartum and postpartum period using three-dimensional and power Doppler ultrasound. J Perinat Med 2010;38:461-465. PMID:
20629490.
26. Rath W, Osmers R, Stuhlsatz HW, Adelmann-Grill BC. Biochemical principles of cervix ripening and dilatation. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol 1994;198:186-195. PMID:
7717006.