Introduction
Microcystic stromal tumor (MCST) of the ovary is a rare subtype of ovarian tumor with less than 30 cases reported worldwide [
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6]. It is a new disease entity first described by Irving and Young in 2009 [
1] based on 16 cases of uncategorized ovarian tumors. The distinctive histological characteristics of the tumor include: a microcystic pattern and regions with lobulated cellular masses with intervening, sometimes hyalinized, fibrous stroma; an absence of morphologic features enabling any other specific diagnosis in the sex cord-stromal category; an absence of epithelial elements; and an absence of teratomatous or other germ cell elements. Immunohistochemically, MCST cells are strongly positive for CD10, vimentin, and Wilms tumor 1, and negative for sex-cord stromal markers (α-inhibin and calretinin) and epithelial membrane antigen.
The origin and genetic background of ovarian MCST is still unclear. In 2011, Maeda et al. [
2] reported β-catenin gene (
CTNNB1) mutation and high nuclear expression of β-catenin in two cases of ovarian MCST. Several more reports that mutation in β-catenin gene (
CTNNB1) is related with ovarian MCST followed [
3,
4,
5,
6]. In this study, we report two cases of ovarian MCST, along with the β-catenin gene (
CTNNB1) mutation in exon 3 that was also detected in both cases. This is the first report of the detection of
CTNNB1 mutation in ovarian MCST using pyrosequencing.
Discussion
MCST of the ovary is a newly categorized ovarian tumor first described by Irving and Young in 2009 [
1] based on 16 cases of uncategorized ovarian tumors. Although MCST is sometimes mistaken for the coma due to its thick hyalinized fibrous band, it has distinctive microscopic features of solid, microcystic or macrocystic patterns, and uniform and round tumor cells with low number of mitotic figures [
4,
7]. Behavior of the tumor is not well known because of limited follow-ups. The available information would suggest it is likely benign in most cases [
1].
As the name hints, the origin of ovarian MCST is thought to be stroma. Irving and Young suggested possibility of stromal origin by excluding other origins. MCST's characteristic immunoprofile (CD10-positive, vimentin-positive, and epithelial membrane antigen-negative) and ultrastructural analysis also supports the possibility of stromal origin. However, Maeda et al. [
2] insisted MCST should be classified as "tumors of uncertain origin" considering the pluripotency of the tumor cells.
In 2011, Maeda et al. [
2] reported β-catenin gene (
CTNNB1) mutation and high nuclear expression of β-catenin in two cases of ovarian MCST. Since 2011, eleven more MCST cases were reported, with β-catenin gene (
CTNNB1) mutation confirmed in eight cases [
3,
4,
5,
6]. β-catenin is a regulatory protein in cell to cell adhesion and gene transcription [
8]. Dysregulation of β-catenin signaling is known to be associated with malignancies, such as colon cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and endometrial cancer [
3,
9]. Nature of the β-catenin protein and frequent expression rate of β-catenin gene (
CTNNB1) mutation in MCST suggests β-catenin plays an important role in pathogenesis of the tumor.
However, there are few cases of non-β-catenin gene (
CTNNB1) mutation MCST. Recently, Lee et al. reported a case of ovarian MCST in a familial adenomatous polyposis patient. In this case, the β-catenin gene (
CTNNB1) mutation was not detected. Instead, a somatic mutation of the APC gene in exon 11, with a heterozygous deletion at nucleotide position c.1540delG was discovered. Yang and Bhattacharjee [
3] reported a case of ovarian MCST with aberrant accumulation of nuclear p27 protein. Because p27
Kip1 is regarded as tumor suppressor gene [
10], Yang and Bhattacharjee [
3] described the possibility that dysregulation of p27
Kip1 plays a role in development of MSCT. However, there have been no further studies about the relationship between accumulation of p27 protein and MCST. Also in this study, genetic analysis was performed for only
CTNNB1 mutation which is known as the key gene alteration of MSCT.
One more thing to emphasize is that pyrosequencing was conducted for gene analysis. Pyrosequencing is a novel method of DNA sequencing based on the sequencing by synthesis. It takes less time and little effort analyzing genetic alteration, compared to conventional Sanger sequencing. This result will help deciding methods for genetic analysis in future MCST studies.
In conclusion, we report two cases of ovarian MCST with its unique histologic and immunohistochemical characters. Through the use of pyrosequencing, a point mutation in β-catenin gene in exon3 was confirmed. As far as we know, β-catenin gene mutation is the key gene alteration of MSCT. Ovarian MCST is known as benign ovarian tumor, and further studies of its genetic background, treatment, and prognosis are needed.