Introduction
Inflammation of the vulvar and vaginal epithelium, vulvovaginitis, is frequently reported in prepubertal girls. Patients present with signs and symptoms such as vaginal discharge, redness of the vulva, and genital soreness. Archetypal low estrogen milieu, as well as a proclivity for deprived local hygiene, in young prepubertal girls are the main causes of susceptibility to non-specific pediatric vulvovaginitis [
1,
2]. In addition, bubble bath use, and a medical history of upper respiratory tract infection (URI) or vulvovaginitis have been reported as risk factors for pediatric vulvovaginitis [
1,
3].
In 25% to 75% of prepubertal girls with symptoms of vulvovaginitis, genital microbiologic investigations indicate the presence of normal vaginal microflora or non-pathogenic bacteria [
4]. Specific pathogens are reported in <50% of patients, and are typically respiratory in origin [
5,
6,
7,
8].
Streptococcus pyogenes is the leading cause of specific pediatric vulvovaginitis [
5,
7].
Although there are numerous reports on the causative microorganisms and clinical features of pediatric vulvovaginitis, data from Korea is very limited. A solitary Korean study, published by our institute in 1999, described some clinical aspects of pediatric vulvovaginitis using data from a small number of cases [
6]. In that study,
Haemophilus influenzae had been reported as the most common pathogenic bacteria, unlike the results of western studies in recent years. The present study aimed to reinforce the information on clinical characteristics of pediatric vulvovaginitis in Korean prepubertal girls with data from participants of larger studies as well as to elucidate contemporary changes in microbiologic etiology since 1999.
Materials and methods
1. Study samples
This was a retrospective analysis of data from 120 prepubertal girls, aged 0 to 9 years, who presented to the outpatient clinic for pediatric and adolescent gynecology at the CHA Bundang Medical Center between January 2009 and December 2014. Cases were defined as prepubertal girls who visited a clinic with typical genital symptoms or physical findings consistent with vulvovaginitis, either vaginal discharge and/or genital redness. Children who were diagnosed without culture were excluded. Patients with a record of Tanner stage ≥2 for breast development were excluded from this study. In addition, patients who were referred to the clinic for the evaluation of genital trauma or child sexual abuse were also excluded.
2. Clinical characteristics
Patient demographics, presenting symptoms, objective findings of external genitalia, and clinical outcomes were assessed. The patient history for URI in the previous month, bubble bath use, and swimming were analyzed as associated factors.
3. Microbiologic data
All subjects had undergone vaginal (n=108) or vulvar (n=12) swabs for culture of aerobic bacteria or yeasts using conventional culture methods. Vulvar swabs had been selectively performed in subjects with small hymenal opening inadequate for vaginal swab (n=8) or subjects with severe vulvar inflammation without vaginal discharge (n=4). The swabs were transported in Amies transport medium, and cultured on 5% sheep blood agar, chocolate agar, and MacConkey agar. Additionally, 7 subjects with abnormal hymenal configuration had undergone Chlamydia antigen polymerase chain reaction from genital specimens. An early morning cellophane tape test had been selectively performed on 10 subjects with genital pruritus to confirm the presence of pinworm eggs. No cases had undergone anaerobic culture tests. Among 6 cases presenting with urinary symptoms, 2 cases with moderate to severe urinary symptoms underwent further investigation by urine culture. In contrast, 4 cases with a definite finding of vaginal discharge accompanied with mild urinary symptoms did not undergo urine microbiologic study.
4. Hygienic care
Subjects were routinely provided instructions for perineal hygienic care at their first visit. The instructions included use of frequent sitz baths, genital drying, and front-to-back wiping, along with avoidance of genital irritants and tight underpants. Treatment success was defined as the complete or partial improvement of genital symptoms without the requirement for antibiotics.
5. Statistical analysis
Various characteristics were compared between the subgroups using analysis of variance or the chi-square test. A P-value of <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant in all analyses.
Discussion
The diagnosis of pediatric vulvovaginitis is complicated by uncertainty in the categorization of normal microflora and potential pathogens. The normal vaginal flora of prepubertal girls is not well established, but several studies have reported predominant microflora in the lower genital tract of healthy children [
9,
10,
11,
12]. Non-specific vulvovaginitis typically presents with normal flora or non-pathogenic bacteria, and is commonly triggered by poor hygienic conditions or genital irritants [
12]. In our study, normal flora or non-pathogenic organisms were isolated in 83.3% (n=100) of patients, compatible with the non-specific vulvovaginitis cases. Previous studies have reported lower rates of non-specific vulvovaginitis, between 25% and 75% (12). Despite a high rate of non-specific infection, the rate of
Escherichia coli (25%, n=30) was relatively low in our study compared to other studies in children with vaginitis [
10,
11]. Although we did not have a control group, the frequency of
Escherichia coli in our study was similar to that reported for asymptomatic children in another study [
10].
The rate and entity of specific microorganisms associated with pediatric vulvovaginitis have been studied since the 1950s. Early studies reported varying rates, ranging from 10% to 50%, as well as dissimilar entities of specific pathogens [
1,
2,
13]. Interestingly, earlier studies reported relatively high rates of gonorrhea [
1,
13,
14] or pinworm infestation [
2], which might reflect the socioeconomic conditions at that time. Meanwhile, studies conducted in the past 20 years have reported more consistent rates, ranging from 20% to 40%, of cases involving specific pathogens, mainly respiratory bacteria such as
Streptococcus pyogenes, Haemophilus influenzae, or
Staphylococcus aureus [
5,
7,
8]. In our study, specific pathogens were found in 16.7% (n=20) of subjects, and respiratory pathogens accounted for 80.0% of the specific vulvovaginitis cases. The rate of specific infection in this study is similar to that reported in a previous Korean study published in 1999 [
6], but relatively low compared to other studies [
5,
7]. The exact cause of the low frequency of specific pathogens in our study is not known; however, the substantial proportion of patients with a history of recent antibiotic use (40%) in our study is likely to have affected the results of bacterial culture.
The frequency of detection of
Streptococcus pyogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, and
Haemophilus influenzae in our patients with specific vulvovaginitis was 60%, 15%, and 5%, respectively. Compared to a previous Korean study, the prevalence of
Haemophilus influenzae is substantially lower, whereas that of
Streptococcus pyogenes is higher [
6]. This difference over time has also been reported elsewhere. In a study from 1992,
Haemophilus influenzae was reported as the most frequent specific bacteria in 200 girls presenting with genital discharge [
2]. However, since 2000,
Streptococcus pyogenes has become the most commonly identified specific pathogen in the majority of studies investigating pediatric vulvovaginitis [
3,
7,
8,
15]. It is possible that the
Haemophilus influenzae vaccination, widely adopted since the 1980s, has reduced the incidence of vulvovaginitis caused by this organism [
7]. The increase in frequency of cases involving
Streptococcus pyogenes is probably related to the increase in cases of streptococcal pharyngitis [
3,
16].
We also analyzed the seasonal distribution of presentation to hospital and the time of symptom onset. Hospital visits increased significantly in the summer and winter, but this trend was attenuated in the analysis of time of symptom onset (
Fig. 2). The greater convenience of hospital visits during vacation periods may potentially affect the seasonal distribution of presentation to hospital. The frequency of cases associated with respiratory pathogens increased slightly in the summer and winter, but the trend was not distinct (
Fig. 3). One study reported the peak incidence of perineal streptococcal infection in winter and spring [
17], but another study failed to demonstrate any distinct seasonal traits in cases of vulvovaginitis caused by
Streptococcus pyogenes [
7].
Many studies have provided support for the hypothesis of transmission of an URI to the perineal area by autoinoculation or gastrointestinal spread [
7,
16,
17,
18]. The rate of concurrence between URI and perineal culture results is variable, but has been reported up to 92% [
17]. The variability observed is probably related to the interval between the expression of the URI and the time of diagnosis because respiratory pathogens may be eliminated from the upper respiratory tract with time. In our study, the frequency of URI was not significantly different between patients with or without respiratory pathogens (
P>0.05). However, this finding does not refute the correlation between URI and vulvovaginitis because of the lack of pharyngeal culture tests in our study, and the varying intervals between the onset of symptoms and diagnosis.
Typically, patients with non-specific vulvovaginitis are primarily treated with hygienic measures, and oral antibiotics are provided if specific bacteria, especially
Streptococcus pyogenes, are detected [
2,
4,
19,
20]. However, in our study, the efficacy of hygienic care was similar in patients with or without specific pathogens (
P>0.05). Almost 70% of patients with specific pathogens were successfully treated with hygienic care and did not require oral antibiotics. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report the successful use of perineal hygienic care as treatment for patients with specific vulvovaginitis.
The strength of this study lies in the use of recent, relatively large-scale samples of pediatric vulvovaginitis. There are 2 major limitations in our study design. First, the lack of a control group, and second, the use of a retrospective medical record review, which limited our ability to collect a uniformed patient dataset and to analyze the treatment outcomes. While the Chi-square test evaluated the efficacy of hygienic care, a significant proportion (11.5%) of missing data may have affected the statistical power of the analysis.
In conclusion, this study has demonstrated relatively low rates of pediatric vulvovaginitis associated with specific pathogens in Korea. Streptococcus pyogenes was the leading cause of specific vulvovaginitis, and no cases involved enteric pathogens, such as Shigella or Yersinia. In addition, our study demonstrated the successful use of perineal hygienic care in patients with specific vulvovaginitis.