Obstetrics & Gynecology Science

CrossRef Text and Data Mining

Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining.

Diagnostic accuracy of hand-held colposcope (Gynocular) in comparison with standard colposcope in patients with abnormal cervical cytology or visual inspection with acetic acid positivity: a cross over randomized controlled study

Sowmiya Jayabalan, Murali Subbaiah, Latha Chaturvedula

Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2023;66(4):300-306. Published online June 27, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.23089

Sowmiya Jayabalan, Murali Subbaiah, Latha Chaturvedula

Obstetrics & Gynecology Science. 2023;66(4):300-306

Link1

Link2 Link3

Image Comparison of a Mobile Colposcope (EVA) versus a Standard Colposcope for Directing Cervical Biopsies in Women with Abnormal Pap Smears: A Non-Inferiority Trial

TM Lombardi, BS Kahn, S Contreras, J Waalen, D Levitz

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2016;23(7):S92

Link1 Link2

Relative Accuracy of Cervical and Anal Cytology for Detection of High Grade Lesions by Colposcope Guided Biopsy: A Cut-Point Meta-Analytic Comparison

Edward R. Cachay, Wollelaw Agmas, William C. Mathews

PLoS ONE. 2012;7(7):e38956

Link1

Diagnostic Role of Portable Colposcope (Gynocular) for Diagnosis of Pre-Invasive Lesions of Cervix

Nisha Singh, Neha Negi, Sonali Sharma, Tuhina Singh

Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology. 2020;18(3):

Link1

Link2 Link3

DIAGNOSTIC COLPOSCOPIC ACCURACY BY THE GYNOCULAR AND A STATIONARY COLPOSCOPE

Helena Kopp Kallner, Maria Persson, Marcus Thuresson, Daniel Altman, Isaac Shemer, Malin Thorsell, Elisabeth Andrea Wikström Shemer

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 2015;31(3):181-187

Link1

A Randomized Trial Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid to Visual Inspection with Lugol’s Iodine for Cervical Cancer Screening in HIV-Infected Women

Megan J. Huchko, Jennifer Sneden, Jennifer M. Zakaras, Karen Smith-McCune, George Sawaya, May Maloba, Elizabeth Ann Bukusi, Craig R. Cohen

PLOS ONE. 2015;10(4):e0118568

Link1

Fluorescence colposcope with TMTP1‐PEG4‐ICG is comparable to the conventional colposcope in identifying cervical precancerous lesions: A randomized controlled trial

Ying Zhou, Chen Wang, Wei Li, Wanrong Lu, Xiaohu Liu, Ling Xi, Pengcheng Li, Jinling Lu, Juncheng Wei

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2023;162(3):969-976

Link1 Link2 Link3

Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA) Positivity Among Female Sex Workers: a Cross-sectional Study Highlighting One-year Experiences in Early Detection of Pre-cancerous and Cancerous Cervical Lesions in Kampala, Uganda

Gertrude Namale, Yunia Mayanja, Onesmus Kamacooko, Daniel Bagiire, Agnes Ssali, Janet Seeley, Robert Newton, Anatoli Kamali

. 2021;

Link1 Link2

Is visual inspection with acetic acid better than cervical cytology to screen women ≥40 years of age for carcinoma cervix? A cross-sectional study on proportion of screen-positive women (by VIA and cervical cytology) having CIN II/III lesion on cervical biopsy: difference between two age groups and among screening methods

Subhankar Dasgupta, Sudhindramohan Bhattacharya

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2012;285(6):1731-1736

Link1

Link2 Link3

Comparison of cervical cancer screening by visual inspection with acetic acid versus cervical-cytology in pregnancy

Saritha Shamsunder, Deepika Pannu, Geetika Khanna, Ananya Banerjee, Vijay Zutshi, Sunita Malik

Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology. 2019;40(01):85-89

Link1