 |
| CrossRef Text and Data Mining |
| Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining. |
| A comparison of intravaginal misoprostol with intravenous oxytocin for labor induction at term. |
| Hyo Sang Han, Jeong Jae Lee, Ahn Joon Mo, Jib Kwang Chung, Im Soon Lee, Kwon Hae Lee |
| Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2003;46(1):138-143. Published online January 1, 2003 |
|
A comparison between intravaginal and oral misoprostol for labor induction: A randomized controlled trial Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 2003;29(2):87-91  Induction of labor in prolonged pregnancy with unfavorable cervix: comparison of sequential intracervical Foley catheter–intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal misoprostol alone Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2011;285(4):967-971 Labor induction with randomized comparison of cervical, oral and intravaginal misoprostol BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2021;21(1): Low dose intravaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2005;90(1):72-73 Association of intravenous oxytocin to vaginal misoprostol for mid trimester labor induction American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2006;195(1):332-333 Oral misoprostol vs. intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with prelabor rupture of membranes at term International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2003;82(1):73-75 Comparison of sublingual misoprostol, intravenous oxytocin, and intravenous methylergometrine in active management of the third stage of labor International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2009;107(2):130-134 A comparison of orally administered misoprostol to intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with favorable cervical examinations American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2004;190(6):1689-1694 Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel (Prepidil gel): Randomized comparison American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1995;173(4):1137-1142 Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1999;181(3):626-629 |
