 |
|
The prognostic significance of p16, Ki-67, p63, and CK17 expression determined by immunohistochemical staining in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1.
Su Mi Kim, Jeong Uee Lee, Dae Woo Lee, Min Jung Kim, Hae Nam Lee
Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;54(4):184-191. Published online 2011 Apr 1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5468/KJOG.2011.54.4.184
|
|
Citations to this article as recorded by
 Analysis of HPV-16 viral load, integration status, and p16 expression in relation to EBV co-infection and cervical lesion severity
Azam Khamseh, Ali Farhadi, Somayeh Jalilvand, Fariba Yarandi, Narges Izadi-Mood, Saied Ghorbani, Hassan Saadati, Elham Shirali, Seyed Mohammad Jazayeri, Jamal Sarvari
Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef Potential role of cancer stem cells as biomarkers and therapeutic targets in cervical cancer
Niyati Sudhalkar, Nidul P. Rathod, Ashwathi Mathews, Supriya Chopra, Harshini Sriram, Shyam K. Shrivastava, Jayant S. Goda
Cancer Reports.2019;[Epub] CrossRef In situ expressions of protein 16 (p16CDKN2A) and transforming growth factor beta-1 in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer
María E. Viloria, Jairo Bravo, Yenddy Carrero, Jesús A. Mosquera
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.2018; 228: 303. CrossRef The utility of ThinPrep cytology and immunohistochemical staining of p16INK4a, Ki-67, and p63 in the assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (dysplasia)
Dina M. Adel Radi, Marwa A. Abd-Elazeem
Egyptian Journal of Pathology.2017; 37(1): 209. CrossRef
|