 |
|
Reviving external cephalic version: a review of its efficacy, safety, and technical aspects
Gwang Jun Kim
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2019;62(6):371-381. Published online 2019 Oct 8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2019.62.6.371
|
|
Citations to this article as recorded by
 Contemporary Trends in Cesarean Delivery Rates and Indications
Sara Jaber, Christina T. Blanchard, Michelle Y. Lu, Gabriella D. Cozzi, Brian M. Casey, Alan T. Tita, Dhong-Jin Kim, Jeff M. Szychowski, Akila Subramaniam
American Journal of Perinatology.2024; 41(S 01): e2026. CrossRef Predictive Factors for Successful Vaginal Delivery after a Trial of External Cephalic Version: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 946 Women
Asaf Bilgory, Olena Minich, Maria Shvaikovsky, Genady Gurevich, Joseph B. Lessing, Ioana Olteanu
American Journal of Perinatology.2023; 40(15): 1679. CrossRef The Effect of External Cephalic Version on Fetal Circulation: A Prospective Cohort Study
Offra Engel, Shmuel Arnon, Gil Shechter Maor, Hanoch Schreiber, Ettie Piura, Ofer Markovitch
Children.2023; 10(2): 354. CrossRef External cephalic version in the outpatient clinic
Gwang-Jun Kim, Ji Su Seong
Journal of Perinatal Medicine.2022; 50(2): 121. CrossRef Ritodrine in external cephalic version: is it effective and safe?
Sin Ae Kim, Eun-Hwan Cha, Kyoung-Chul Chun, Young Ah Kim, Jae-Whoan Koh, Jung Yeol Han, Jong Hee Hwang
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science.2022; 65(5): 420. CrossRef External Cephalic Version—A Chance for Vaginal Delivery at Breech Presentation
Ionut Marcel Cobec, Vlad Bogdan Varzaru, Tamas Kövendy, Lorant Kuban, Anca-Elena Eftenoiu, Aurica Elisabeta Moatar, Andreas Rempen
Medicina.2022; 58(11): 1619. CrossRef A Simulation Model for External Cephalic Version
Carla Baaklini, Natalie Menassa, Jalen T Larios, Derek A Ballas
Cureus.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
|